• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
AFRIPOL

AFRIPOL

en English
ar Arabiczh-CN Chinese (Simplified)nl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germanit Italianpt Portugueseru Russianes Spanish
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission Statement
  • Articles
  • Book Review
  • Archive
  • Contact Us

Nigeria: Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) Needs Adaptive Reconciliation

July 10, 2014 by Emeka Chiakwelu Leave a Comment

Flickr/zeepkist

The much debated and contentious Petroleum Industry Bill 2012 (PIB) is a quantum leap in the remaking of Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, if and when it becomes the law of the land.  Some Nigerians deemed the bill controversial because many of them have not read the bill but rather depend on the opposition of the bill to propagate their incoherence and distortions.  One thing for sure, the government of Nigeria must be applauded for initiating the task to reform and make some crucial changes in the most important sector of Nigerian economy.  The bill is not perfect; nevertheless it will re-launch the deteriorated sector into a solidify reformed and streamlined entity.

The PIB must be balanced and made attractive to investors by incentivizing it without jeopardizing and compromising the spirit and integrity of the bill.

The PIB must be adjusted, refined and consolidated to become the perfect bill for a constructive reform is needed in the oil and gas industry.   Some adjustments and adaptations are necessary to satisfy and clarify some impending edges of the bill.

Since the discovery of oil in Nigeria by Shell- British Petroleum in 1950, Nigeria has made billions of dollars, yet the country accrued one of the worst indexes of misery. Over 70 percent of Nigeria lives in abject poverty, struggling to provide their families with three square meals.  The electricity and modern infrastructures are pipe dream. The wealth of the nation has been siphoned to foreign and off shores accounts.  The worst of all, the environmental degradation brought by oil exploration and the subsequent health problems have approached an explosive dimension, an unmitigated disaster.  The oil curse and imminent Dutch disease have done untold harm to Nigeria’s manufacturing and agricultural sectors. Therefore without  a doubt, a reform is needed, but is PIB capable of ushering in the requisite reform?

The PIB is intended to rescind and replace the below current laws in the book:

*Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (Establishment) Act 2003;

*Petroleum Equalization Fund (Management Board, etc.) Act CAP 11 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004

*Petroleum (Special) Trust Fund Act, CAP 14 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004; and

*Petroleum Technology Development Fund Act CAP P15 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004;

*Petroleum Act CAP 10, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004;(‘Petroleum Act’)

*Motor Spirits (Returns) Act, CAP M20 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004

*Associated Gas Re-injection Act CAP A25 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004

*Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Production Sharing Act, CAP D3 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria,   2004; except for sections 16 subsection (1) and (2)

Petroleum Profits Tax Act, CAP P13 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

The contemporary laws are not consistent with country’s ambition; therefore we rightly welcome the PIB.  But wait a second!  Let’s put this PIB in perspective. How is going to benefit average Nigerian and what are the structures put together to make sure that accumulated revenues and taxes are channel to building the necessary infrastructures for economic development.   The key point for PIB is to reform the petroleum industry and raise quantifiable fund to develop the country.

PIB is an ambitious project in the sense that it will tax more and accumulate more revenues from the   industry partakers and participants  including –  “Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp., Total SA,  Eni SpA, who produce around 90% of Nigeria’s oil through several joint ventures with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp.”

The pros and cons of such a massive taxation must be fully examine in order  to make sure that it will not be obstacle for further investment in oil and gas sector of the economy. The bill stipulated that the taxation for upstream drilling is to be pegged at 50 percent and for downstream drilling at 25 percent.

Extracting and exerting such a huge levy on the oil companies may sound tantalizing and satisfying but the possible downside must be considered and evaluated.  Since most of the financing of the high intensive projects in the sector are done by these big oil companies, it is necessary to tread carefully. As Mark Ward, the managing director of ExxonMobil’s Nigerian unit argued that such a massive taxation makes Nigeria’s oil and gas industry unattractive to invest.  Ward said at an Energy conference, “the terms proposed increase royalties, increase taxes, and lower allowances or incentives all at the same time,” will make Nigeria “one of the world’s harshest fiscal regimes.”

Ward’s criticism cannot be wave off easily, without a detailed examination, but that does not entails that his argument is 100% correct.  The level of the participation of local financing is quite minuscule and high taxes probably will not incentivize those international oil companies operating in Nigeria to further investment in the country.

Nigeria failed woefully to utilize the accumulated revenue from the oil industry to develop the industry. There by relying on foreign capital from the big oil companies to play the critical role in the extraction, drilling and development of the industry.  The best thing for Nigeria to do with the PIB is to progressively levy the companies from somewhat lower percent in the course of 5-10 years until it approach the targeted percentage.  The good window is that the gradual increases of the taxation has a lower and lessen impact on the companies, inducing the receiving of the burden in good faith. This will also send the message that punitive action is not intention of the petroleum bill, that we are all together in the struggle to develop the industry.

Other aspects of the PIB were encouraging including the total deregulation of the downstream drilling.  My idealistic wish is that there comes a day that Nigerian government will totally withdraw and disengage from the participation in the oil and gas industry.  The only supposedly function is to tax the industry while NNPC will be privatized and shares floated and bought over by local investors.  But until we get there, Nigerian government must concentrate and direct her resources in developing the industry with verifiable and strong local content.

Bitumen or Asphalt inclusion as a petroleum product is not a stretch as opposition members of PIB chose to ferment.  Although the bituminous shales were not part of the contemporary Petroleum Act but in the quest to broaden revenue collection, the government  is entitle to making the inclusion, provided that it will not hamper the attraction of  investments in the industry.

The section of the PIB that empowered the minister of petroleum and the president to issue drilling licenses may be further elaborated with conditional ties and modus operandi to ensure that biases, mediocrity and nepotism will be checked with transparency.

Filed Under: Strategic Research & Analysis

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More to See

Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire have Declared war on the Global chocolate industry over cocoa prices (video)

March 20, 2023 By AFRIPOL

(video) I Will Never Call And Congratulate Sanwo-Olu For This Sham Of An Election – Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour

March 19, 2023 By AFRIPOL

RSS AllAfrica News: Latest

  • Africa: TotalEnergies CAF CL - Elshahat Double Sends Ahly's Red Devils Flying Into Quarters
    [CAF] In front of slightly over 50,000 fans at the Cairo International Stadium on Saturday, record African champions Al Ahly soared into the quarter-finals of the TotalEnergies CAF Champions League after a well worked 3-0 victory over Sudan's AL Hilal.
  • Africa: TotalEnergies CAF CL - Petro Hit Vita to Finish Third in Group a
    [CAF] Angola's Petro de Luanda finished third in Group A of the TotalEnergies CAF Champions League after a nervy 1-0 win over Congo's AS Vita Club at their Estádio 11 de Novembro backyard in the capital Luanda.
  • Africa: CAF African Schools Football Championship the Finalists - Cecafa - Unaf
    [CAF] Fountain Gate Secondary School cruised to the title in the girls' competition at the CECAFA zonal finals that were played in February. The Tanzanian side defeatedAwaro Senior Secondary from Ethiopia 3-0 in the final, using the benefit of home ground advantage to book their place at the continental event.
  • Rwanda: How New Rwanda-Australia Trade, Investment Body Will Boost Ties
    [New Times] The Australia -- Rwanda Trade and Investment Council (ARTIC), a new body formed during the Australian leadership retreat in Brisbane from March 24 to 25, aims to strengthen relations between Australia and Rwanda by building mutually beneficial links in business, education, and culture.The council which is composed of business and community leaders, plans […]
  • Sudan: Statement By Spokesman of Political Process
    [SNA] Khartoum -- A meeting was held in the Republican Palace at 01:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 1st, which included the President of the Transitional Sovereignty Council, Gen. Abdul-Fattah Al-Burhan, the Vice - President of the Transitional Sovereignty Council, Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, and the leaders of the civil forces that signed the framework agreement […]
  • Sudan: Parties of Framework Agreement Decide to Solve Military Reform Issues Before Final Signing
    [SNA] Khartoum -- The military and civil parties that signed the framework agreement, led by the President of the Sovereignty Council, Gen. Abdu-Fattah Al-Burhan, his Deputy, Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, the member of the Sovereignty Council, Al-Tahir Hajar, the civil parties that signed the framework agreement, the facilitating tripartite mechanism of the United Nations, the […]

Tags

Achebe Africa Anambra Boko Haram Buhari CBN Corona Virus Egypt Igbo IMF Inflation Jonathan Kenya Nigeria Okonjo Iweala Peter Obi Sanusi Senate Soludo South Africa Soyinka United States
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archives

Footer

Africa Political and Economic Strategic Center, AFRIPOL is foremost a public policy center whose fundamental objective is to broaden the parameters of public policy debates in Africa. To advocate, promote and encourage free enterprise, democracy, sustainable green environment, human rights, conflict resolutions, transparency and probity in Africa.

Recent

  • Ghana President Publicly ends Cocoa Export to Switzerland.
  • VP Kamala Harris Gives Emotional Speech After Visiting Cape Coast Castle In Ghana (video)
  • U.S Vice President Kamala Harris arrives at Ghana Jubilee House to meet President Akufo-Addo
  • US Vice President Kamala Harris arrives in Ghana for African tour (video, Pics)
  • Peter Obi exchanged views on the state of the nation with OBJ @ Anambra Airport (pics)

Search

Tags

Achebe Africa Anambra Boko Haram Buhari CBN Corona Virus Egypt Igbo IMF Inflation Jonathan Kenya Nigeria Okonjo Iweala Peter Obi Sanusi Senate Soludo South Africa Soyinka United States

Copyright © 2023 · AFRIPOL